Yannik Kelm vs Mustapha El Natour Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 10:27 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Kelm vs M. El Natour

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

LIB
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kelm 1 - 0 Natour
They have played 2 sets in total, with Yannik Kelm winning 2 and Mustapha El Natour winning 0. The last match between Yannik Kelm and Mustapha El Natour was at the M15 Monastir, 21-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Yannik Kelm getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kelm | 1 |
| Natour | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Monastir(10-21-25)
Y. Kelm vs M. E. Natour H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 49.09% (54-56) | Career Total W/L | 32.61% (15-31) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
Y. Kelm vs M. E. Natour Match Preview:
- In the past 6 months, Yannik Kelm shows a stronger second serve, securing 43.10% of points, compared to Mustapha El Natour's 38.89%.
- However, Mustapha El Natour excels in winning return points on second serves, at 55.26%, over Yannik Kelm's 52.54%.
- For first serve returns, Yannik Kelm has a distinct edge, capturing 34.11% of points, versus El Natour's 19.15%.
- Under pressure, Kelm demonstrates resilience by saving 44.37% of breakpoints, higher than El Natour's 40.00%.
- In the last year, Kelm boasts a stronger overall match win rate of 56.86%, while El Natour has a lower win rate of 37.50%.
- Both players perform best on Hard surfaces, with a win percentage of 56% for Kelm and El Natour, although Kelm shows more consistency.
- Regarding competition level, both mainly play in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K, but Kelm's performance is superior at this level.
- As for opponent caliber, El Natour has contended against more highly ranked opponents (average rank 146.81) than Kelm (average rank 201.24).
- Intriguingly, El Natour shines in deciding sets with an 83% win rate, surpassing Kelm's 54%.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
Yannik Kelm appears to hold a stronger position in terms of overall match success, serving performance, and capability to handle pressure situations effectively. His superior first serve return statistics also suggest the potential to gain critical points in pivotal moments.
Mustapha El Natour's advantages lie in greater competitiveness against higher-ranked opponents and an impressive track record in deciding sets. This resilience could prove advantageous if the match becomes tightly contested.
While both competitors have their strengths, the balance tips slightly in favor of Yannik Kelm due to his consistent match outcomes and serving efficacy, making him the more likely winner in this upcoming encounter.
Yannik Kelm vs Mustapha El Natour Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. Kelm vs M. E. Natour H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:58:7 | Average Match Time | 1:58:7 |
| 56% (35/62) | 1st Serve % | 55% (39/71) |
| 74% (26/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (24/39) |
| 56% (15/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (14/32) |
| 31% (4/13) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 46% (33/71) | Return Points Win % | 34% (21/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Kelm Recent Matches Played
M. E. Natour Recent Matches Played

Y. Kelm vs M. E. Natour Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.09% (54/56) | YTD Win/Loss | 32.61% (15/31) |
| 48.99% (121/126) | Sets Win/Loss | 32.32% (32/67) |
| 49.53% (1156/1178) | Games Win/Loss | 42.20% (368/504) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 32.26% (10/21) |
| 48.15% (39/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (5/10) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 72 | Aces Total | 9 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 273 | Total Double Faults | 43 |
| 1:3:42 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 283.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 120.54 |
| 58% (2605/4512) | 1st Serve % | 56% (246/437) |
| 61% (1602/2605) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (136/246) |
| 44% (840/1907) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (64/191) |
| 42% (203/486) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (11/37) |
| 42% (1873/4487) | Return Points Win % | 38% (157/413) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.43% (54/51) | Futures W/L | 31.11% (14/31) |
| 49% (54/110) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (15/46) |
| 55% (11/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 52% (14/27) | Deciding Set Win % | 71% (5/7) |
| 86% (56/48) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (12/12) |
| 14% (56/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (12/0) |
| 11% (54/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (34/3) |